Future of UK Regulation Conference 2023: Getting UK clinical trials back on track

This is the second of four blogs reporting from the BIA conference, ‘The Future of UK Regulation: Driving innovation in the life sciences’, which looks at what is being done across the research ecosystem to get commercial clinical trials back on track in the UK. 

Recommendations from the review into the UK commercial clinical trials landscape

Moves to address the fall in the number of industry sponsored trials and make the UK a more attractive destination for investment must encompass everything from scientific advice to the completion of a study. The stage has been set to achieve this by the review of commercial clinical trials carried out by Lord James O’Shaughnessy, former health minister and Senior Partner, Newmarket Strategy, which was published in May 2023.

The review set out 27 recommendations to improve the environment for commercial clinical trials. Lord O’Shaughnessy told delegates that the aim is to ‘grow the whole pie’, not to increase the number of commercial trials at the expense of academic studies, where the UK continues to perform strongly, with one million patients recruited in 2021–22. However, he said, "a competitive commercial clinical trials environment is important because it acts as a beacon of the strength of the life sciences sector as a whole."

The main reason the UK has fallen down the league table of commercial trials is that it has become much more difficult to set up trials quickly. “Of all the metrics, that is the most important one,” said Lord O’Shaughnessy.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) put in place a plan to clear the backlog of clinical trial application that built up in 2022-23 (see below). Lord O’Shaughnessy said the foundation is in place and it is “time to look to the future and to get a really radically quick turnaround time”.  

While there has been a good start in implementing the recommendations, it is necessary to maintain momentum so that the outstanding issues are addressed. “One part this group can play in that is keeping the government honest in delivering on the commitment that it has made in response to the review,” Lord O’Shaughnessy concluded.

Enabling an efficient and innovative clinical research system across the NHS

More than two years before the O’Shaughnessy review, the Future of Clinical Research Delivery set out a vision for a more patient-centred, pro-innovation and digitally enabled clinical research environment that would build on the successes and the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic.

There are five key themes underpinning the vision: clinical research embedded in the NHS; patient-centred research; streamlined, efficient and innovative research; research enabled by data and digital tools; and a sustainable and supported research workforce.

"These are very much interdigitated with the O’Shaughnessy review and give a mandate to accelerate implementation, but in doing so it is important to recognise that no single person or organisation owns the whole of the research ecosystem," said Professor Lucy Chappell, Chief Scientific Adviser, Department of Health and Social Care and Chief Executive, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). She added: “The only way we are going to achieve this is by all team members pulling in the same direction."

The latest data demonstrate the programme of reforms have ‘grown the pie’. In October 2022, 73,940 people were recruitment to studies in England, in comparison to 80,533 trial participants in September 2023. Meanwhile, the number of participants in commercial studies increased from 2,077 in October 2022 to 5,067 in September 2023.

Regulatory measures to speed up clinical trial approval

The MHRA has taken a cross-agency approach and introduced new ways of working to address what were clearly some significant shortcomings in its clinical trials application assessment process. As a result, performance has improved and a backlog of almost 1,000 applications was cleared between July and September.

"This provides the platform to ensure that processes are further optimised and sustainable for the future, with system-wide collaboration," said James Pound, Deputy Director, Standards and Compliance, MHRA. “That brings benefits not only to the work we do at the MHRA, but collectively that brings benefits to patients, the life sciences ecosystem and the wider UK economy,” Mr Pound told delegates.

In terms of performance, the MHRA currently receives 7,000 clinical trial applications per year. These require varying levels of assessment across the core technical disciplines, all within the statutory timeframes.

In its “crisis response” to the backlog, the MHRA set up a dedicated task force, made up of redeployed and trained staff from across the agency and newly recruited assessors. The task force worked to clear the backlog over the summer, while also processing all new applications received during this time. “This represents a very, very significant increase from the normal level of throughput,” said Mr Pound.

In part, this was achieved by adopting a more risk-proportionate approach, recognising for example that first-in-human trials present very different levels of uncertainty from a phase 4 study of a licensed medicine. This allowed the MHRA to develop a more targeted assessment approach that was related to the level of risk and uncertainty, and to maximise the use of information from approvals granted by other stringent regulators to inform MHRA clinical trial approvals.

“We worked with our partners across the system to help reduce delays,” Mr Pound said. The MHRA will build on this and further refine our approach as we look to the future. From 1 September all applications received are being assessed within the statutory timelines and the agency is committed to ensuring this remains the case.

Perspective from the Health Research Authority

While the main regulatory function of the Health Research Authority (HRA) is to provide research ethics committees review, it has a second function, which is to coordinate and standardise regulatory practice for research across the UK. "That has given it a central role in underpinning the programme of work to implement a whole system approach and make the UK an attractive place to conduct clinical research," said Dr Janet Messer, Director of Approvals, HRA.

From March to August 2023, ethics reviews were completed on time. “Now that MHRA timelines are back on track, we’re in a great position to really make a difference with the combined review process,” Dr Messer told delegates.

The standard review process is complemented by a fast-track ethics review that is available to global clinical trials and phase I trials. Between March and August 2023 all fast-track ethics reviews were completed in less than 30 days; a reorganisation of operations to make things work more efficiently had brought this down to below 20 days by August.

Further time is needed for sponsors to respond to any questions. “But with an ethics review timeline of 20 days, that gives us plenty of scope to ensure you get your study up and running well within 60 days,” said Dr Messer.

For more information, please contact Dr Christiane Abouzeid, Head of Regulatory Affairs, BIA.

Dr Christiane Abouzeid

Dr Christiane Abouzeid

Head of Regulatory Affairs



More news and updates 

CEO Update - 10 June 2024

UK General Election and what it might mean for the industry, including Labour's pledges on Brexit and business taxes. Upcoming events including the Cambridge Wide Open Day and the Life Science Leadership Summit. UK tech companies pitching at the London Stock Exchange and Amber Therapeutics securing $100 million in funding.

Women in Biotech Mentoring Programme: Dr Carolina Grandellis

In this interview, Dr Carolina Grandellis, Lead of the Earlham Institute Biofoundry, explores the profound impact of the BIA's Women in Biotech mentoring programme on her professional and personal life.

An urgent call for technical standards and metrics for engineering biology

There are currently very few technical standards and metrics that are specific and appropriate to the field of engineering biology. Across the innovation pipeline, there are opportunities for standards to support faster development and enable accelerated commercialisation of the bioeconomy. In response to this, an effort was undertaken with the objective of identifying key areas where standards and metrics would enable the growth of the global bioeconomy.

CEO Update - 3 June 2024

MSD Merck acquire UK biotech EyeBio for $1.3 billion upfront, ASCO and BIO conference week and the UK General election campaign produces little news for the life science sector.

CEO Update - 28 May 2024

The UK General Election has been called for Thursday, 4 July. In practical terms, this means the end of the legislative pathway for many proposals as Parliament shuts down. Keep reading for updates on our general election webinars and UK events at BIO 2024.

CEO Update - 20 May 2024

The UK continues to lead the global discussion on tackling the antibiotic emergency. Last week saw leading global figures convene at the Royal Society to pledge money and agree actions on the AMR agenda.

Spotlight on hearing therapeutics landscape: a clinical perspective

Professor Gerard O’Donoghue shares his perspective as Consultant Neurotologist at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust on why he believes that the development of new treatments and their subsequent clinical adoption are vital for people living with hearing loss.

Deep Biotech companies using engineering biology for good: Epoch Biodesign case study

Featured in BIA's Deep Biotech report, Epoch Biodesign aims to revolutionize plastic waste management by creating tailor-made enzymes that efficiently depolymerize a wide range of plastics into recyclable materials, offering a circular solution to tackle plastic pollution and promote sustainability.

Women in Biotech Mentoring Programme: Helen and Kathryn's experience

In this interview, consultant and best-selling author Kathryn Simpson, together with patent attorney Helen Bartlett, dive into their reasons for joining the BIA's Women in Biotech mentoring programme, and how this experience has impacted their professional and personal lives.

Deep Biotech companies using engineering biology for good: Solena Materials case study

Solena Materials is a pioneering biotech company spun out from Imperial College London, specialising in the development of computationally designed synthetic protein materials, originally featured in BIA's Deep Biotech report on disruptive innovation for global sustainability.


More within