What is a rare disease?

A rare disease is defined as one that affects less than 5 in 10,000 of the general population and an ultra-rare disease affects less than one patient per 50,000 of the European population. In the UK, it is estimated that 1 in 17 people – approximately 3.5 million people – may be affected by a rare disease at some point in their lives. The impact that rare diseases have on patients, their families, and society is profound, as many are severe, chronic and progressive, with high mortality rates. 

In England, there is no dedicated process to assess orphan medicines and uptake of these medicines is varied. According to the Office of Health Economics of the 143 orphan medicines that were available in the UK, only 68 of these medicines were reimbursed and made available to NHS patients in England. In contrast, 116 orphan medicines are reimbursed in France and 133 are reimbursed in Germany.  

 

 

The BIA Rare Disease Industry Group (RDIG) represents a group of innovative bioscience companies that specialise in treatments for rare and ultra-rare diseases. The RDIG is committed to developing recommendations that can pragmatically inform and improve the challenge of ensuring patient access to treatments for rare and ultra-rare conditions, sometimes referred to as orphan and ultra-orphan medicines.

The BIA RDIG's report, A Rare Chance for Reform identifies key areas where reform would lift those barriers and ensure access to rare disease medicines.

 

Our recommendations include:

Accelerate access through a conditional access period

Introduce a fast initial evaluation that grants conditional access through a Managed Access Agreement, at a price consistent with other fast-adopting countries. The proposed Innovative Medicines Fund (IMF) would be the ideal vehicle to fund medicines within the Managed Access Agreement. This initial access should be followed by a more in-depth re-evaluation after a period agreed on a medicine by medicine basis, to improve the certainty and quality of data available for assessment. This process should be aligned with the existing accelerated regulatory processes by which drugs are often approved and be supported by adequate infrastructure to enable collection of real-world evidence.

Address systemic issues to build a strong environment for access to orphan and ultra-orphan medicines

Resolve systemic issues such as consistency in evaluations, balancing value for money and patient needs, and ensuring appropriate infrastructure is in place to maximise the value of these treatments.

Update the evaluation framework to better account for the unique challenges of rare and ultra-rare diseases

As an outcome of the NICE Methods Review, assessments should be adapted to determine the value of a orphan and ultra-orphan medicines holistically, by capturing direct health benefits and indirect benefits. This can be achieved by amending the way that clinical and cost-effectiveness are calculated and pragmatically used, and increasing the flexibility for ICER thresholds through modifiers, to ensure the process is fairer and more robust.

Evaluate orphan medicines and ultra-orphan medicines through a single rare disease pathway

Adopt a single process to ensure that all orphan and ultra-orphan medicines are assessed by a process that accounts for their unique challenges.

Assess empirically-based ICER thresholds on a sliding scale

Create a sliding scale of thresholds for assessing orphan and ultra-orphan medicines supported by clear criteria on where an orphan medicine falls on the scale, to remove the need for arbitrary thresholds.

Continue to create a supportive atmosphere for patient groups

Strengthen NICE’s existing approach to empower patient groups by identifying and addressing the concerns of smaller patient organisations, improving communication with stakeholders during the evaluation process and providing clarity on how evidence presented by patient groups translates into decisions