What Q2 2026 reveals about the direction of antibody therapeutics
From first-in-class approvals to billion-dollar deals, Q2 2026 signals a new era for antibody innovation
|
Drug |
Date |
Region |
Modality / target |
Indication |
|
Pivekimab sunirine-pvzy / Decnupaz |
27 May |
US |
CD123-directed ADC |
Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm |
|
Anbenitamab / 恩尼妥 |
29 May |
China |
HER2 bispecific antibody |
HER2-positive gastric / gastroesophageal junction cancer after trastuzumab-containing therapy |
|
Gumokimab |
11 June |
China |
Anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody |
Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis |
|
Silevimig |
22 June |
China |
Fully human bispecific antibody targeting rabies virus glycoprotein |
Passive immunisation after rabies exposure |
|
Iza-bren / izalontamab brengitecan |
22 June |
China |
EGFR × HER3 bispecific ADC |
Recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after platinum chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 therapy |
|
Veligrotug-vvze / Lumvoa |
26 June |
US |
IGF-1R monoclonal antibody |
Thyroid eye disease |
The approvals show how far antibody formats have diversified. For example, silevimig is a fully human bispecific antibody approved in China for rabies post-exposure passive immunisation, highlighting bispecific development beyond oncology. Meanwhile, iza-bren is especially notable as the first bispecific ADC to receive regulatory approval globally, combining dual-target binding with targeted payload delivery to potentially improve tumor selectivity, internalisation and therapeutic potency compared with conventional single-target ADCs.
Deals: assets, platforms and infrastructure
Business development was also active this quarter, with the largest antibody-related transactions combining clinical assets, discovery platforms and research infrastructure.
|
Date |
Companies |
Potential value |
Focus |
|
12 May |
Bristol Myers Squibb / Hengrui Pharma |
Up to $15.2 bilion |
13 oncology, hematology and immunology programs |
|
28 May |
Pfizer / Innovent Biologics |
Up to $10.5 billion |
12 early-stage oncology programs, including ADCs and multispecific antibodies |
|
June 25 |
Merck KGaA / Bio-Techne |
$11.3 billion enterprise value |
Life science tools, analytical technologies, proteins, antibodies and workflow solutions |
|
22 June |
AbbVie / Apogee Therapeutics |
$10.9 billion |
Zumilokibart, a half-life-extended anti-IL-13 antibody for atopic dermatitis |
|
7 April |
Gilead Sciences / Tubulis |
Up to $5 billion |
TUB-040, a NaPi2b-targeting ADC, and next-generation ADC platform capabilities |
The BMS-Hengrui collaboration stands out for scale, covering 13 programs and up to about $15.2 billion in potential value. Pfizer’s Innovent agreement, worth up to $10.5 billion, also underlines continued interest in China-originated antibody innovation, particularly ADCs and multispecific formats.
Not every large deal was centred on a therapeutic asset, as Merck KGaA’s proposed $11.3 billion acquisition of Bio-Techne points to the importance of enabling technologies: reagents, proteins, antibodies, analytics and workflow tools that support discovery and development.
AI is changing the bottleneck
AI-enabled antibody discovery is also a central theme. Models can support sequence generation, de novo design, structure prediction, virtual screening, affinity optimisation and developability assessment.
But computational output is not the same as a drug candidate. Binding affinity, specificity, expression, stability, aggregation risk and developability still require wet-lab validation. As AI systems generate larger antibody panels, the pressure shifts toward high-throughput expression, rapid affinity testing and structured experimental datasets.
In practice, discovery is becoming more iterative: design, build, test, learn then repeat. The quality of experimental data may matter as much as the model used to generate candidates.
Conditional activation: aiming for therapeutic index
Conditionally activatable antibodies are another area to watch. These formats are designed to remain silent or attenuated in circulation, then activate preferentially in disease-associated microenvironments.
The rationale is that many targets are not fully disease-specific. They may be enriched in tumors or inflamed tissue but also present in healthy tissue. For ADCs, T cell engagers and immune-activating antibodies, this raises the risk of on-target, off-tumor toxicity.
Activation strategies can include protease-sensitive masking, pH-dependent binding, ATP-responsive designs or other disease-linked triggers. The broader question is no longer only whether an antibody binds, but where and under what biological conditions it binds.
What to watch next
Several regulatory decisions are expected soon:
|
Candidate |
Company |
Modality / target |
Indication |
Milestone |
|
Apitegromab |
Scholar Rock |
Myostatin monoclonal antibody |
Spinal muscular atrophy |
FDA PDUFA expected late September 2026; EMA decision anticipated mid-2026 |
|
Garetosmab |
Regeneron |
Activin A monoclonal antibody |
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva |
FDA target action date in August 2026 |
|
Ifinatamab deruxtecan |
Daiichi Sankyo / Merck |
B7-H3 ADC |
Previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer |
FDA PDUFA date: 10 October 2026 |