20 August 2026

BIOSECURE Act: key takeaways for UK life sciences

Claire Smith, who sits on BIA’s Intellectual Property Advisory Committee (IPAC) committee, and James Johnston explain what the US BIOSECURE Act means for UK biotech companies


Headshot of Claire Smith, Partner – Commercial & IP transactions, Bristows

Claire Smith
Partner – Commercial & IP transactions, Bristows

Headshot of James Johnston, Associate - Commercial & IP transactions, Bristows

James Johnston
Associate – Commercial & IP transactions, Bristows

Whilst the US BIOSECURE Act is not a blanket ban on Chinese outsourcing, it does create a new diligence and contracting challenge for UK life sciences companies.

It restricts US federal agencies, contractors and certain grant or loan recipients from procuring or using biotechnology equipment or services from designated ‘biotechnology companies of concern’ (BCCs).

In practice, however, the effect can travel far beyond the US. UK companies often sit within supply chains, collaborations or partnering arrangements that ultimately touch US federal funding or procurement.

Exposure to a China-linked CRO, CDMO or biotech supplier may become commercially relevant, even where the UK company itself receives no US government money.

A US customer, collaborator or other partner may ask whether any part of the supply chain depends on a supplier that is, or could become, a BCC. If the answer is yes, they may seek additional protections — from additional warranties to termination triggers.

For UK biotechs, the practical risk of relying on a supplier that is later designated as a BCC may not be felt in the short term.

For instance, it would not, by itself, block privately funded US clinical trials, FDA approval or certain types of US sales.

However, it may impact partnering opportunities, cut off certain US sales channels and ultimately affect investment or exit value down the line.

The first official BCC list is expected by December this year and will be updated at least annually, creating uncertainty for long-term manufacturing, development and collaboration arrangements. UK companies should therefore treat supplier risk as a live strategic issue, not a one-off legal check.

If you are considering partnering arrangements that could be impacted by the BIOSECURE Act, please contact Claire Smith or James Johnston to discuss this further.
Bristows logo

This is a guest blog. Its author is responsible for content within it, which does not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of BIA.

Related topics